Procrastination Nation · Paper No.02 · Prompts for the AI curious

Prompt
Along

Five prompts run through the paper, for whichever AI you already use. Each takes eight to twelve minutes and works better if you answer honestly, which is harder than it sounds. These are the longer, road-tested versions of the boxes in the paper.

Before you tell the robot everything

The Copy button copies only the words you can see, and copying them doesn't run anything. What you type next goes to the AI you chose, not to us. Use your organisation's approved tool for anything about work; for the more personal prompts, use whichever tool you're comfortable with, having checked its privacy and memory settings. Leave out names, other people's details and anything confidential. The prompts don't need them. These are questions about how you work, not therapy. If one lands somewhere heavier than that, stop, and talk to a person you trust.

Prompt 01 · about 10 minutes · 2 cold runs in testing

The week you didn't take

A build partner interviews you for six questions, then makes you name the one thing you would build in five free working days. It reflects and checks; you choose.

The prompt

You're a practical build partner, not a coach. I have five free working days and I want to use them to make one thing I'd love to have made, for home or for work. It doesn't have to be software and it doesn't have to be impressive. It has to be something I'd actually finish.

Ask me six questions, one at a time. Ask one, then stop and wait for my answer. In your own words, cover: what I already make or fix for people without being asked; what I keep meaning to sort out; who it would be for; what tools I already have; what I'd enjoy even if it didn't work; and what "finished" would look like on Friday. If I get stuck, give me one short example and ask again. I can say "pass".

Don't rate or comment on my answers. Go straight to the next question. Keep every reply under 60 words until the end. No praise, no headings, no bullet points. No suggestions until all six are answered. Plain British English. Don't ask for names, confidential work or anything private; if I start sharing it, ask me to use a placeholder.

Then reflect back the two or three things you heard me care about most, a sentence each. Ask me to name the one thing I'd build. If I can't, offer three rough starting points and ask me to pick one and put it in my own words. Don't choose for me. Then ask what I'd do in the first hour of day one. Once I've said it, write a five-line brief in my words: what I'm building, who it's for, what done looks like, what I won't build, and my first hour. Then stop. Start with question one only.

Why it works

The paper's Incubation stage as an exercise. The block is rarely permission; it is not knowing what you want. Fewer than one in fifteen professionals build anything of their own with AI, and this is the first step.

A good result

A five-line brief in your words: what you're building, who it's for, what done looks like, what you won't build, and your first hour on day one.

Tested

2 cold runs, September 2026. A locked-down Copilot user finished in 9 turns with a self-filling reporting pack. A reluctant non-user who said "don't know really" got one example and carried on.

Prompt 02 · about 8 minutes · 2 cold runs in testing

Your AI doesn't know you

Seven questions about one recent time you put something off and one good working spell. You write the three sentences at the end, not the AI, and you decide whether it remembers them.

The prompt

I want you to know when I work badly and when I work well, so you're more useful to me. Don't diagnose me, label me or tell me what I seem to be feeling. This isn't therapy. It's working conditions.

Ask me seven questions, one at a time. Ask one, stop, and wait for my answer. Cover: a recent time I put off something that mattered; what happened just before; what I reached for instead (my inbox, a meeting, more research, my phone, you); what about the task was uncertain; a recent time I worked unusually well; what was different; and which of those conditions I could change. I can say "pass". One short follow-up per question at most.

Don't comment on my answers, just ask the next question. Keep every reply under 40 words until the end. No praise, no bullet points. Plain British English.

At the end, ask me to finish three sentences in my own words: "I tend to put things off when..." "The first sign is..." "I work best when..." Tighten my wording only after I've agreed the meaning. Then tell me one specific thing you'll do differently when I bring you a task I've clearly been avoiding.

Then ask if I'd like you to remember those three sentences. Only say you've saved them if you genuinely have a memory feature and have used it. If you don't have one, or I say no, tell me in one line where I could keep them so they're in front of you next time (custom instructions, saved information, a project, or a note I paste in at the start of a chat). Start with question one only.

Why it works

Dissonance: noticing the signal. Most people have taught their AI tasks and never a working condition. This is the prompt most likely to change what someone does tomorrow.

A good result

"I tend to put things off when... The first sign is... I work best when..." in your own words, plus one specific thing the AI will do differently when you bring it something you've been avoiding.

Tested

2 cold runs. A daily ChatGPT user closed in 10 turns. Round 1 caught the model saying "Saved" with no memory feature; the prompt now forbids that claim.

Prompt 03 · about 8 minutes · 2 cold runs in testing

Run it on something real

The paper's four questions, asked one at a time on a decision you are actually avoiding. Then you choose one move and get asked, once, whether it's another way of avoiding.

The prompt

I'm avoiding a decision. Help me look at it without making it for me. First ask me to describe it in one or two sentences, without names or anything confidential. Then ask me these four questions, addressed to me, exactly one at a time, waiting for my answer each time.

One: procrastination isn't the problem, so what's the uncertainty in front of you that's making you want to leave the room? Two: have you given this any space, or only more attention? (Space means stepping away and letting it sit. Attention means more research, another opinion, another framework.) Three: how much of what you're waiting for is real information that would change your move, and how much are you waiting so you don't have to feel uncertain? Four: what would you do if you weren't thinking about how it looked?

Don't diagnose me, interpret my answers, reassure me or add questions of your own. Keep every reply under 40 words. No bullet points. Plain British English. If I say I don't know, or pass, ask the same question once more in plainer words and ask for my best guess. Then move on.

At the end, don't summarise. Ask me to choose one move: a deliberate pause with a date I'll come back on; one named piece of missing information I'll go and get; or the smallest useful thing I could do before the end of tomorrow. Don't choose for me. When I've chosen, ask me once whether this move could be another way of avoiding it. Then ask me to confirm or change it, and stop. Start by asking for the description only.

Why it works

This is the diagnostic. Dissonance, Incubation, Decisive, Identity: answering each question is what moves you to the next. The AI is not allowed to summarise, interpret or decide.

A good result

One of three moves: a deliberate pause with a return date, one named piece of information you'll go and get, or the smallest useful thing before the end of tomorrow. Confirmed, then it stops.

Tested

2 cold runs. A sceptical CEO who said "I don't know" to question one closed on "ask the two of them tomorrow". A reluctant one-line answerer closed on "start the application form tomorrow lunchtime".

Prompt 04 · about 12 minutes · 2 cold runs in testing

A week-shaped experiment

You draft one team AI experiment in a sentence. The AI checks it against four conditions and tells you plainly what's missing until it holds. It asks about approved tools first.

The prompt

Help my team design one small AI experiment we could run this week. Not a pilot, not a rollout. An experiment with four conditions: safe to get wrong; finished by Friday; something we'll observe, chosen before we start; done together and talked about afterwards. If I don't manage a team, treat "team" as the two or three people I work with most.

First ask me two things, one at a time: which AI tools we're allowed to use at work, and what kinds of information we're allowed to put into them. If I'm not sure, design the experiment with made-up or public information only, and nothing about customers, colleagues or anything confidential.

Then ask me three more questions, one at a time, waiting for each answer: what the team does most days; one AI tool or task we've been putting off trying; and what would make it feel safe to get wrong. Keep every reply under 60 words until the proposal. No suggestions until all five questions are answered. No headings or bullet points. Plain British English.

Then ask me to draft the experiment in one sentence: by Friday, who will use which tool on what, to find out what. Wait for my attempt. Only if I say I'm stuck, offer three rough shapes (one task done two ways; one AI output checked hard by a human; one small thing built with dummy data) and ask me to adapt one. Check my draft against the four conditions and tell me plainly what's missing. Ask me to revise it. Don't rewrite it for me. Then ask me for my first move and which day I'll make it. Finish with the experiment in one short paragraph in my words: what we'll do, how we'll know it worked, who does what, and my first move and its day. Then stop. Start with the first question only.

Why it works

The four conditions from the paper: safe to get wrong, finished by Friday, something observed and chosen in advance, done together and talked about. It starts from the tool your team has been putting off, which is most teams.

A good result

One paragraph in your words: what you'll do, how you'll know it worked, who does what, and your first move with its day.

Tested

2 cold runs. A finance team lead unsure of policy got a made-up-data experiment on a copy of last month's file. A freelancer with no team got the two-or-three-people fallback and said "I'm stuck"; the shapes appeared only then.

Prompt 05 · about 10 minutes · 2 cold runs in testing

Accelerate or deliberate

Horizon, altitude and agency, each defined so the AI can't guess, on a live decision. You choose one of three paces, then it challenges you once, in three sentences.

The prompt

I have a decision and I don't know whether to make it now or sit with it. Both can be right. Some decisions want speed and some want time, and knowing which is the skill. Help me work out which this one wants. Don't tell me what to decide.

First ask me to describe the decision in a sentence, without names or confidential detail. Then ask me about three things, one at a time, waiting for each answer. Use these meanings, not your own.

Horizon: what's the honest deadline, and how much of the urgency I feel is real rather than panic or other people's impatience? Altitude: whose perspective is missing from how I'm seeing this, and what would change if I took it? Agency: what part of this is mine to change, including any part I'm playing in keeping it stuck?

Then one more: what single piece of information could genuinely change my choice, and what am I researching mainly to feel safer?

Keep every reply under 50 words. No praise, no diagnosis, no bullet points. Plain British English. If I get stuck, ask a smaller version of the same question. I can say "pass".

Then ask me to choose one of three: accelerate; deliberate until a date I name; or run a small reversible test first. Treat all three as legitimate. Don't choose for me. Whatever I choose, ask for the honest deadline and my next move. Then challenge my reasoning once, in three sentences at most, with the strongest reason I might be wrong. Ask if I want to change my answer. Repeat my final choice, deadline and next move back to me in one line each, and stop. Start by asking for the description only.

Why it works

Positive procrastination made practical. Pace is the decision-making tool; the skill is knowing whether this one wants speed, time, or a small reversible test. The AI cannot pick for you.

A good result

Your choice, your honest deadline and your next move, read back in one line each. Then it stops.

Tested

2 cold runs. A senior leader's supplier decision closed in 9 turns with a sharper test than she started with. A reader who pasted in family names was asked to try again without them before anything else happened.

How these were tested

Every prompt was pasted, exactly as written, into a fresh AI session with no context, no memory and no knowledge of Uncertainty Experts. A tester then answered as a specific kind of reader (a locked-down Copilot user, a daily ChatGPT drafter, a sceptical chief executive, a finance team lead unsure of the rules, a freelancer with no team, a reluctant non-user who answered in one line) until the exchange ended. Ten runs in two rounds. Round one found four real faults, fixed in the versions above: turn-by-turn praise, a false "saved" to memory, the four questions read out in the first person, and the AI supplying the first move instead of asking for it. Tested on Claude, September 2026. Behaviour on ChatGPT, Copilot and Gemini will vary a little; if yours does something odd, tell us and we'll fix the wording.

If you're testing for us

Open a fresh chat (Temporary Chat in ChatGPT, a new chat in Copilot). Copy one prompt with the button, paste it, send. Pick a kind of reader from the list above and answer in their voice, short answers, and say "pass" or "I don't know" at least once. Don't help it. When it stops, note the tool, the number of turns, whether it asked one question at a time, whether it suggested or diagnosed before the end, whether it flattered you or went therapist, and whether it closed on a next move and a day. Send us the first and last AI reply. Two prompts per person is plenty.

Small print

These prompts are plain text for you to use in an AI service of your choice. We don't operate that service, don't see what you type into it, and your use of it is covered by its own terms and privacy notice. The prompts are for reflection and experimentation, not medical, legal, financial or employment advice, and AI can be wrong, so keep a human in charge of any decision. Use your organisation's approved tool for anything about work and don't enter confidential information or personal details about other people. This page records ordinary website analytics only. Provided as is. Uncertainty Experts, part of Media Zoo. Last reviewed 11 September 2026.